The Supreme Court’s decision in the Hobby Lobby case has started a lot of people thinking about how access to contraception has changed women’s lives. The Hobby Lobby decision allows some companies to refuse to pay for all forms of contraceptive care for their employees. If all of the owners of a “closely held corporation” declare that they do not approve of some forms of contraception on religious grounds, then they don’t have to pay for insurance coverage for contraception. The talk about this decision and how it may affect healthcare for all Americans has started a lot of people thinking about the struggle to get any form of contraception approved.
When Margaret Sanger (1879-1966) started working as a nurse in New York City, she saw a number of women who were suffering from their inability to keep from becoming pregnant over and over again. Doctors were not allowed to tell women how to avoid unwanted pregnancies; so many families were doomed to poverty and poor health because they could not afford large families. With contraceptives declared illegal and therefore unavailable to any except the wealthy, many poorer women resorted to abortionists or tried to abort a fetus themselves. When Margaret Sanger, who had seen her own mother die at 48 worn out by twelve pregnancies and weakened by tuberculosis, realized how many women were sacrificed because of their inability to control births, she determined to devote her life to changing the law.
By starting a newsletter, lecturing, and then opening the first birth control clinic in America, Sanger tried to introduce contraception to women. Both she and her sister were arrested at their Brooklyn clinic and charged with distributing obscene literature—information about birth control. Margaret Sanger served a short jail term for the crime, but she received a great deal of publicity and the issue was brought before the public.
It is hard today to remember how the lack of birth control affected women’s lives during the years when it was forbidden. Employers discriminated against married women, refusing to hire them because they might become pregnant at any time. Graduate schools refused to admit married women students with the excuse that their education was wasted because an unplanned pregnancy could derail a degree at any time.
Margaret Sanger fought for many years to make contraception available in the United States. It was a long struggle. By 1965 when the Supreme Court finally decided in the case of Griswold v. Connecticut that contraception should be available, Sanger was 85 years old. A year later she died.
Some of Margaret Sanger’s legacy was unfortunate. She believed in eugenics and favored larger families for well-educated, middle class families. The poor and especially nonwhite people, she believed, should strictly limit their family size. Many of the statements she made during her later years were repugnant, and they have been seized upon by conservative politicians to blacken her reputation. But the major battle she fought—to enable women to have some control over their bodies and the size of their families—was an important one. Much of the freedom enjoyed by women today has come about because of the struggle of Margaret Sanger and her associates.
Today, on the Fourth of July, when we celebrate the legacy of our Founding Fathers—a legacy deeply tarnished by the racism and prejudices of their ideas—is surely a good time to assert again that we can celebrate the achievements of many individuals despite their flaws and mistakes. None of our heroes or heroines were perfect, but we can accept the good that they did at the same time that we cast aside the bad.
The Supreme Court is much like our individual heroes. Some of their decisions have contributed decisively to Americans’ welfare and freedom; others have needed to be modified as time revealed their flaws. As for the Hobby Lobby decision, it seems quite likely that the best that can come from it may be the movement toward having single payer healthcare in the United States so that the health and happiness of Americans depend on themselves, through their elected government, and they are freed from the idiosyncratic and sometimes irrational beliefs of their employers.
6 thoughts on “Margaret Sanger: A Flawed Heroine for Family Planning”
This site was… how do you say it? Relevant!!
Finally I’ve found something which helped me. Thanks a lot!
Very great post. I simply stumbled upon your weblog and wished to mention that I have truly loved browsing
your weblog posts. In any case I will be subscribing in your rss feed and I hope you
write again very soon!
I’ll immediately take hold of your rss feed as I can’t to find your email subscription hyperlink or e-newsletter service.
Do you have any? Please let me realize so that I may subscribe.
If you look down the right hand column, you will see the button where you can click to subscribe by email. Thanks for following me!
I blog quite often and I seriously thank you for your information. This great article has really peaked my interest.
I’m going to take a note of your site and keep checking for new details
about once per week. I opted in for your RSS feed too.
I LOVE THIS POST!!! Thank you for reminding us of the brutal realities of women’s lives before contraception. Too many people these days never bother to think – really THINK – about what it means to be unable to have any control other than abstinence over the advent of pregnancy. If people really grasped the implications, I suspect far fewer of them would be so zealous for limiting or denying access to contraception.
It’s also important to recognize and accept, as you write, that even people with many admirable ideas could have some less than admirable ones. We accept that our Founding Fathers owned slaves; why can’t we accept that Margaret Sanger had some unfortunate ideas about race?
Finally, I couldn’t agree more about the need for single-payer health insurance. The CRUCIAL flaw with the Hobby Lobby case, it seems to me, is that employers should not be the source of health insurance at all. Once the U.S. recognizes this, as so many countries already have, we’ll all be better off.